EXTR SD 052914
 
UNITED STATES
 
OMB APPROVAL
 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
OMB Number: 3235-0697
 
 
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Expires: May 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Estimated average burden hours per response....480.61
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Form SD

SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORT



EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
 
000-25711
 
77-0430270
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
 
(Commission File No.)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
 
 
145 Rio Robles
San Jose, California
 
 
 
95134
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
 
 
(Zip Code)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allison Amadia (408) 579-2800
 
 
 (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.)





Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
[x] Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2013.







Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure
RCOI Determination
Extreme Networks, Inc. (“Extreme Networks”) is diligently attempting to determine the country of origin of Tungsten, Tantalum, Tin and Gold (“3TG minerals”) used in its products. However, since this is the first year of this new requirement, Extreme Networks has yet to be able to determine the country of origin of all 3TG minerals used in its products. Where Extreme Networks has been able to determine the country of origin of the 3TG minerals, Extreme Networks has not found suppliers who are purchasing conflicts minerals from the DRC and other associated countries.

Description of method
As background, Extreme Networks manufacturers its computer networking products through contracts with third party manufacturers located around the world. These third party manufacturers select the components and materials through their own design and procurement organizations for the manufacture of Extreme Networks products consistent with the design requirements and specifications provided to them by Extreme Networks.

In 2013 and in light of the requirements of Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Extreme Networks requested, and continues to request, that its third party manufacturers investigate the source of their use of 3TG minerals for Extreme Networks products and then develop an auditable chain of custody for such 3TG minerals necessary for the manufacturing of Extreme Networks products.

In addition to initially investigating the source of 3TG minerals, Extreme Networks is requiring its suppliers to establish an ongoing process to continue to determine the country of origin of any 3TG Minerals and provide conflict mineral sourcing information to Extreme Networks on an annual basis in accordance with Extreme Networks’ environmental standards and the Extreme Networks Conflict Minerals Policy. See the Conflict Minerals Report of Extreme Networks, Inc. for more details. A copy of Extreme Network's Conflict Minerals Report is filed as Exhibit 2.01 hereto and is publicly available at http://investor.extremenetworks.com.

Except for the historical and factual information contained herein, the matters set forth herein contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form SD. Because such statements deal with future events, they are subject to risks and uncertainties, including that actual results may differ from further investigations of 3TG Minerals from different environments located throughout the world and any other material future risks related to this process, including but not limited risks that certain suppliers may not complete the questionnaire process, provide incomplete or inaccurate information, or diligently pursue investigations of the source of 3TG Minerals. In addition, although Extreme Networks was not required by law to report on the 3TG Minerals contained in the products of a company it recently acquired, Enterasys Networks, Inc., during this reporting period, Extreme Networks may encounter unforeseen difficulties in investigating Enterasys Networks’ products.

Extreme Networks undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking information in this Form SD except as required by law.

Item 1.02 Exhibit
Section 2 - Exhibits
Item 2.01 Exhibits
Exhibit 1.02 - Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form - see attached.







SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ ALLISON AMADIA
Date:
May 29, 2014
 
Allison Amadia
 
 
 
Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




EXTR SD 052914 EX 1.02


Conflict Minerals Report
This is the Conflict Minerals Report of Extreme Networks, Inc. (“Extreme Networks”) for the calendar year of 2013 and is being submitted in accordance with Rule 13p1 (“Rule 13p1”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”). For the purpose of the required Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI), Extreme Networks continues to receive supply chain responses as of the date of the filing of this Report. Rule 13p1 was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act). Rule 13p1 imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC registrants whose manufactured products contain conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of their products.

Conflict Minerals are defined as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, and their derivatives, which are limited to tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold (“3TG minerals”) for the purposes of this assessment. Please refer to Rule 13p1, Form SD and the 1934 Act Release No. 3467716 for definitions to the terms used in this Report, unless otherwise defined herein.

I.
OVERVIEW. Except as specifically stated below, the information included in this report includes the activities of all majority-owned subsidiaries of Extreme Networks that are required to be consolidated by law. It does not include recently acquired companies, including its subsidiary, Enterasys Networks, Inc.

Extreme Networks develops, creates, manufactures and sells computer networking equipment to primarily publicly traded companies, government entities and any other large, small and/or private businesses. Extreme Networks is headquartered in San Jose, CA and has more than 12,000 customers in over 80 countries. For more information, visit the company's website at http://www.extremenetworks.com

Extreme Networks’ products are contracted to be manufactured by third party manufacturers that are responsible for the selection of the components and materials from their own design and procurement organizations. These products are very complex and utilize electrical and mechanical components from hundreds of suppliers around the world, who in turn utilize their own suppliers to source raw materials and ultimately the actual minerals used within the components of the products.

As a result of using third party manufacturers to manufacturer its networking computer products, Extreme Networks is several levels removed from the actual mining of conflict minerals. Extreme Networks does not make purchases of raw ore or unrefined conflict minerals and makes no purchases of conflict minerals in the Covered Countries.

II.
DUE DILIGENCE. In accordance with Rule 13p1, Extreme Networks has conducted, and is conducting, a due diligence effort to determine the origin of the 3TG minerals used in its computer networking products. In conducting its due diligence, Extreme Networks is in the process of implementing the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict Affected and High Risk Areas (OECD 2011) (“OECD Framework”), an internationally recognized due diligence framework. Extreme Networks’ due diligence efforts include the following:

1.
Company Policy. Extreme Networks has established a Conflict Minerals Policy that directs its suppliers to utilize a supply chain that does not support the conflict in the DRC (and associated countries) and is requiring annual reports on the country of origin for 3TG minerals, utilizing the reporting form of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, Incorporated (“EICC”) and Global e-Sustainability Initiative (“GeSI”).

2.
Surveys. Extreme Networks is conducting supply-chain surveys with its direct Tier 1 suppliers using the EICC/GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template to identify the smelters and refiners and to determine the risks of any sources from the DRC or associated countries within the supply chain.






3.
Industry Supply Chain Management Tools. In addition to direct queries to its direct suppliers, Extreme Networks utilizes industry supply chain management tools to determine if there is any risk of conflict minerals being used from DRC-conflict areas.

4.
Continual Investigation. Although Extreme Networks has not found any 3TG minerals used in its products from a source in the DRC-conflict areas, Extreme Networks is continually trying to identify any such risks within its supply chain, and if any DRC-supported source is found, Extreme Networks will work to remove such suppliers from its supply chain in accordance with Extreme Networks’ environmental standards and its Conflict Minerals Policy.

III.
RESULTS. Subject to Section IV below, the Extreme Networks’ EICC-GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Form that provides the detailed results of the RCOI conducted by Extreme Networks for all products of Extreme Networks produced during CY 2013 is available upon request made to green@extremenetworks.com.

1.
EICC Conflict Minerals Report Information. To date, the data received from these suppliers has been reviewed and utilized to populate the EICC-GeSI Conflict Minerals Report Form, which is available at the link referenced in the opening paragraph of this Section III.

2.
Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI) Result for CY2013. Based upon the information received to date, Extreme Networks has determined in good faith that for calendar year 2013, its conflict minerals status resulting from its due diligence efforts shows a portion to be from EICC Certified Smelters and a portion where the status is still being determined through the EICC certification process.

IV.
LIMITATIONS.

1.
No Audit. This Report has not been subject to an independent private sector audit as allowed under Rule 13p-1, which provides a temporary accommodation for the first two years following November 13, 2012.

2.
No Enterasys Products. On November 1, 2013, Extreme Networks acquired a privately-held company, Enterasys Networks, Inc. Extreme Networks is not required to report on the products manufactured and sold by Enterasys Networks in this reporting period (i.e., the 2013 calendar year). However, Extreme Networks will be required to report on the Enterasys products in the next reporting period for calendar year 2014, and as a result, its next report will cover all products of the combined companies.

V.
PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS. Prior to the next reporting date, Extreme Networks is planning on implementing additional steps to improve the timeliness and substance of the information being gathered in its due diligence process to further mitigate the risk that it may be using conflict minerals from armed groups. It is anticipated that these additional steps will include:

1.
Compliance Module. Extreme Networks plans to implement a Compliance Module within its Product Lifecycle Management system that will be utilized for future conflict minerals reporting. Through this module, Extreme Networks hopes to increase the response rate of its suppliers’ smelters surveys, including but not limited to its integrated circuit suppliers.

2.
Quality Management System. In addition, Extreme Networks is implementing a RCOI and conflict minerals disclosure process so that it is part of Extreme Networks’ Quality Management System (“QMS”). In making this process part of Extreme Networks’ QMS, a “corrective action-preventive action process” will be implemented that will be consistent with the OECD Framework.
        
3.
Review of, and Improve the, Process. Extreme Networks will continue to review and implement the requirements of Rule 13p-1 with its suppliers so that Extreme Networks receives complete, timely, current and accurate reporting from its suppliers. More specifically, Extreme Networks will work to increase the response rate of the suppliers’ smelters surveys. Also, during the next calendar year, Extreme Networks will





continue to request that its suppliers provide a completed and accurate EICC-GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting form for the products that such suppliers manufacture for Extreme Networks.

VI.
SUMMARY. As a result of a multi-tiered supply chain system, Extreme has been unable to determine the absolute country of origin of the 3TG utilized for all of its products. To reduce the risk of supporting the conflict in the DRC or associated countries in the upcoming year prior to the next reporting period, Extreme will continue to diligently investigate as required by law and improve its due diligence efforts so that it utilizes top tier suppliers that are also working to avoid use of any conflict minerals from DRC or other associated countries.