SEC Filing - Extreme Networks, Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended December 29, 2002 OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-25711

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		77-0430270
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3585 Monroe Street Santa Clara, California		95051
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (408) 579-2800

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x

No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes x

No ¨

The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $.001 par value, outstanding at

February 3, 2003 was 115,967,177.

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

INDEX

		PAGE

PART I. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):		3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2002		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001		5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		17

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		35

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		37

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		37

Item 2. Changes in Securities		Not Applicable

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		Not Applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		37

Item 5. Other Information		Not Applicable

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		37

Signatures		38

Certifications		39

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

	December 31, 2002			June 30, 2002
	(Unaudited)			(Note 2)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	35,477		$	71,830
Short-term investments		159,443			164,667
Accounts receivable, net		21,729			51,344
Inventories, net		28,039			24,627
Deferred income taxes		42,882			42,882
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		12,446			13,126

Total current assets		300,016			368,476
Property and equipment, net		82,282			99,551
Marketable securities		210,990			163,560
Deferred income taxes		105,817			90,617
Other assets		16,042			13,547

TOTAL ASSETS	$	715,147		$	735,751


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	22,331		$	29,215
Accrued compensation and benefits		14,001			12,082
Restructuring liabilities		5,293			3,525
Accrued commitments		4,519			8,063
Accrued warranty		10,211			9,055
Deferred revenue		43,493			40,772
Other accrued liabilities		19,522			23,913

Total current liabilities		119,370			126,625
Long-term deposit		272			272
Restructuring liabilities, less current portion		23,968			19,896
Convertible subordinated notes		200,000			200,000

Total liabilities		343,610			346,793

Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and capital in excess of par value		655,572			653,547
Deferred stock compensation		(6,383	)		(10,167	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		3,091			1,851
Accumulated deficit		(280,743	)		(256,273	)

Total stockholders’ equity		371,537			388,958

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	715,147		$	735,751

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31, 2002			December 31, 2001			December 31, 2002			December 31, 2001
Net revenue	$	90,216		$	109,066		$	190,785		$	217,355

Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		44,926			51,450			96,425			134,762
Sales, marketing and service		30,397			35,703			63,650			72,688
Research and development		13,418			14,604			27,927			31,015
General and administrative		6,729			5,974			13,664			14,087
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		1,783			2,655			3,784			5,528
Amortization of goodwill		—			11,364			—			22,010
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		—			1,216			—			2,423
Restructuring charge		14,187			—			14,187			—
Property and equipment write-off		12,678			—			12,678			—

Total costs and expenses		124,118			122,966			232,315			282,513

Operating loss		(33,902	)		(13,900	)		(41,530	)		(65,158	)
Loss on investments		—			—			—			(6,000	)
Other income, net		990			1,701			1,870			4,123

Loss before income taxes		(32,912	)		(12,199	)		(39,660	)		(67,035	)
Benefit for income taxes		(13,173	)		(1,547	)		(15,190	)		(20,375	)

Net loss	$	(19,739	)	$	(10,652	)	$	(24,470	)	$	(46,660	)

Net loss per share—basic and diluted	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.42	)

Shares used in per share calculation—basic and diluted		114,819			112,680			113,409			112,317

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002			2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(24,470	)	$	(46,660	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		14,282			15,543
Amortization of goodwill		—			22,009
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		—			2,423
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			2,700
Provision for inventory		—			5,596
Deferred income taxes		(15,200	)		(22,144	)
Restructuring charge and property and equipment write-off		26,865			—
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		3,784			5,528
Write-down of investments		—			6,000
Compensation expense for options granted to consultants		—			420
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		29,615			6,501
Inventories		(3,412	)		6,903
Prepaid expenses and other current and noncurrent assets		(1,815	)		1,015
Accounts payable		(6,884	)		1,249
Accrued compensation and benefits		(799	)		(2,166	)
Restructuring liabilities		(3,736	)		—
Accrued commitments		(3,544	)		(124	)
Accrued warranty		1,156			3,290
Deferred revenue		2,721			9,506
Other accrued liabilities		(4,391	)		10,665

Net cash provided by operating activities		14,172			28,254

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(11,584	)		(20,634	)
Purchases and maturities of investments, net		(40,966	)		(7,378	)
Acquisition of business		—			(14,910	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(52,550	)		(42,922	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,025			6,578
Proceeds from issuance of convertible subordinated notes, net		—			193,899

Net cash provided by financing activities		2,025			200,477

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(36,353	)		185,809
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		71,830			87,722

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	35,477		$	273,531

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Extreme Networks, Inc. (“Extreme Networks” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of network infrastructure equipment and markets its products primarily to business, governmental and educational customers with a focus on large corporate enterprises and metropolitan service providers. Extreme Networks was incorporated in California in 1996 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1999.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Fiscal Year

Extreme Networks’ fiscal year is a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year that closes on the Sunday closest to June 30^th every year. Fiscal 2003 is a 52-week fiscal year. The December 31, 2002 quarter closed on December 29, 2002 and comprised 13 weeks of revenue and expense activity. All references herein to “fiscal 2003” or “2003” represent the year ending June 29, 2003.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Extreme Networks have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2002 was derived from audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These interim financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with Extreme Networks’ audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Extreme Networks’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

The unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary to a fair presentation of the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented and the financial condition of Extreme Networks at December 31, 2002. The results of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the remaining quarters or fiscal 2003.

Certain items previously reported in specific financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2003 presentation. Such reclassifications have not impacted previously reported revenues, operating income (loss) or net income (loss).

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Extreme Networks and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in which management intends to maintain more than a temporary 20% to 50% interest, or otherwise has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method. Investments in which Extreme Networks owns less than a 20% interest and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are carried at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value.

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated to United States dollars at current rates of exchange, and revenues and expenses are translated using weighted-average rates. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses during the interim periods reported have not been significant. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are included as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss).

Cash Equivalents, Short-Term Investments and Marketable Securities

Highly liquid investment securities with insignificant interest rate risk and with original maturities of three months or less at date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Investment securities with original maturities greater than three months and remaining maturities of less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Investment securities with remaining

maturities greater than one year are classified as marketable securities. Extreme Networks’ investments are comprised solely of U.S., state and municipal government obligations and corporate securities.

To date, all marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, when material, reported net-of-tax as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included in other income, net. The cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. Premiums and discounts are amortized over the period from acquisition to maturity and are included in investment income, along with interest and dividends.

Extreme Networks has certain other minority investments in privately held companies. These investments are included in other assets on the balance sheet and are carried at cost. Extreme Networks monitors these investments for other than temporary impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary. Extreme Networks did not record any write-downs of its privately held investments for the three or six months ended December 31, 2002. Extreme Networks recorded write-downs of $6.0 million related to impairments of its privately held investments for the six months ended December 31, 2001. Investments in privately held companies with a carrying value of $0.2 million remained as of December 31, 2002.

Inventories

Inventories consist of raw materials and finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market (on a first-in, first-out basis). Inventories consist of (in thousands):

	December 31, 2002		June 30, 2002
Raw materials	$	3,474	$	3,052
Finished goods		24,565		21,575

Total	$	28,039	$	24,627

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of certain of Extreme Networks financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The fair values of investments are determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments. The fair value of the convertible subordinated notes due 2006 is estimated using quoted market prices.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

Extreme Networks may be subject to concentration of credit risk as a result of certain financial instruments consisting principally of marketable investments and accounts receivable. Extreme Networks has placed its investments with high-credit quality issuers. Extreme Networks will not invest an amount exceeding 10% of the corporation’s combined cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities in the securities of any one obligor or maker, except for obligations of the United States government, obligations of United States government agencies and money market accounts. Extreme Networks performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral in exchange for credit. Extreme Networks endeavors to keep pace with the networking industry by adopting credit policies and standards in view of assessable risks.

In regard to customer concentration, one distributor of Extreme Networks’ products accounted for 10% and 15% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. One distributor of Extreme Networks’ products accounted for 13% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2002. One distributor of Extreme Networks’ products and one end-user customer accounted for 16% and 10% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue, respectively, for the six months ended December 31, 2001.

Revenue Recognition

Extreme Networks derives the majority of its revenue from sales of its stackable and chassis-based networking equipment, with the remaining revenue generated from service fees relating to the maintenance and installation of, and training on, its products. Extreme Networks’ revenue recognition policy follows SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Extreme Networks generally recognizes product revenue from end-user and reseller customers at the time of shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price of the product is fixed or determinable and collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured. When significant obligations or contingencies remain after products are delivered, such as installation or customer acceptance, revenue and related costs are deferred until such obligations or contingencies are satisfied. Revenue from service obligations under maintenance contracts

is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual period, which typically range from one to three years. When Extreme Networks provides a combination of products and services to customers, revenue is allocated based on the relative fair values.

Extreme Networks makes certain sales to partners in two-tier distribution channels. The first tier consists of a limited number of independent distributors that sell primarily to resellers and, on occasion, to end-user customers. Under specified conditions, Extreme Networks grants these distributors the right to return a portion of unsold inventory to it for the purpose of stock rotation. Therefore, Extreme Networks defers the recognition of revenue on sales to distributors until the distributors sell the product, as evidenced by a monthly sales-out report that the distributors provide to Extreme Networks. The second tier of the distribution channel consists of a large number of third-party resellers that sell directly to end users and are not granted return privileges, except for defective products.

Warranty Reserves

Extreme Networks’ hardware warranty period is typically 12 months from the date of shipment to end users and 14 months from the date of shipment to channel partners, which include resellers and distributors. Upon shipment of products to its customers, including both end users and channel partners, Extreme Networks estimates expenses for the cost to repair or replace products that may be returned under warranty and accrues the amount, as revenue is recognized. In addition, the Company estimates expenses for the cost to repair or replace products that may be returned under service agreements after the expiration of the warranty period as well as products returned or replaced at the discretion of the Company outside the warranty period and not covered by a separate service agreement. As a result, the charges to cost of revenue and expenses incurred include not only expenses associated with repairs or replacements during the warranty period but also amounts related to obligations under service contracts and amounts associated with discretionary repair or replacement programs. In future periods, these amounts will be more readily segregated as part of the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system.

The determination of warranty requirements is based on actual historical experience with the product or product family, estimates of repair and replacement costs and any product warranty problems that are identified after shipment. Extreme Networks adjusts these accruals at each balance sheet date in accordance with changes in these factors. Changes in Extreme Networks’ accrued warranty account for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Balance beginning of period	$	12.1		$	6.2		$	9.1		$	3.0
Charges to cost of revenue for warranty and service contracts		5.9			5.7			15.5			16.8
Expenses incurred for warranty and service contracts		(7.8	)		(5.6	)		(16.4	)		(13.5	)
Change in estimate related to accrued warranty		—			—			2.0			—

Balance end of period	$	10.2		$	6.3		$	10.2		$	6.3

Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Geographic Areas

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision makers with respect to the allocation of resources and performance.

Extreme Networks operates in one segment, the development and marketing of network infrastructure equipment. Extreme Networks conducts business globally and is managed geographically. Revenue is attributed to a geographical area based on the location of the customers. Extreme Networks does not allocate cost of revenue, research and development, sales, marketing and service, or general and administrative expenses to its geographic areas or measure the performance of geographic areas based on allocation of these costs and expenses. Management does not believe that allocating these expenses is significant in evaluating Extreme Networks’ performance on a geographic basis.

Information regarding geographic areas is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002		2001		2002		2001
Net revenue:
United States	$	35,012	$	36,829	$	75,876	$	70,028
Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”)		21,876		23,365		42,543		48,014
Japan		17,170		38,232		45,176		75,384
Other		16,158		10,640		27,190		23,929

	$	90,216	$	109,066	$	190,785	$	217,355

As of December 31, 2002, substantially all of Extreme Networks’ assets were attributable to its operations conducted in the United States.

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 requires goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and written down when impaired, rather than being amortized as previous standards required. Furthermore, SFAS 142 requires purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Extreme Networks adopted this statement beginning July 1, 2002. In accordance with SFAS 142, Extreme Networks ceased amortizing goodwill as of July 1, 2002. Goodwill at July 1, 2002 was $1.0 million.

The following table presents the impact of SFAS 142 on net loss and net loss per share had the standard been in effect for the three and six months ended December 31, 2001 (in thousands, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss—as reported	$	(19,739	)	$	(10,652	)	$	(24,470	)	$	(46,660	)
Adjustments:
Amortization of goodwill		—			11,364			—			22,010
Income tax effect		—			(3,977	)		—			(7,704	)

Net adjustments		—			7,387			—			14,306

Net loss—adjusted	$	(19,739	)	$	(3,265	)	$	(24,470	)	$	(32,354	)

Net loss per share—basic and diluted—as reported	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.42	)

Net loss per share—basic and diluted—adjusted	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.29	)

Extreme Networks is required to perform a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances. No impairment of goodwill was recognized as of December 31, 2002. There can be no assurance that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) is based on pre-tax financial accounting income (loss). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts.

Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase, and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants, convertible subordinated notes and convertible securities. Dilutive earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings (loss) per share calculation plus the dilutive effect of options, warrants, convertible subordinated notes and convertible securities. Diluted net loss per share was the same as basic net loss per share for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 because Extreme Networks had net losses for those periods. The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss	$	(19,739	)	$	(10,652	)	$	(24,470	)	$	(46,660	)

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		115,522			114,166			115,384			113,940
Less: Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase		(703	)		(1,486	)		(1,975	)		(1,623	)

Weighted-average shares used in per share calculation—basic and diluted		114,819			112,680			113,409			112,317

Net loss per share—basic and diluted	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.42	)

The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation above because to do so would be antidilutive for the periods (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,		Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002	2001	2002	2001
Stock options outstanding	1,082	3,259	1,741	4,011
Unvested common stock subject to repurchase	703	1,486	1,975	1,623
Convertible subordinated notes	9,542	3,181	9,542	1,590

Total potential shares of common stock excluded from the computation of earnings per share	11,327	7,926	13,258	7,224

Derivatives

Extreme Networks uses derivative financial instruments to manage exposures to foreign currency. Extreme Networks’ objective for holding derivatives is to use the most effective methods to minimize the impact of these exposures. Extreme Networks does not enter into foreign exchange forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. All derivatives, whether designated in hedging relationships or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. For a derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss is recognized in other expense in the period of change together with the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributed to the risk being hedged. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into other expense upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in other expense immediately.

Foreign Currency Hedging

Extreme Networks’ exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations arises in part from intercompany accounts between the parent company in the United States and its foreign subsidiaries. These intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary in order to centralize foreign exchange risk with the parent company in the United States. Extreme Networks is also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars for consolidation purposes. As exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from expectations and may adversely impact overall financial results.

Extreme Networks has a program to reduce the effect of foreign exchange transaction gains and losses from recorded foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. This program involves the use of foreign exchange forward contracts in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. A foreign exchange forward contract obligates Extreme Networks to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent United States dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. Under this program, increases or decreases in Extreme Networks’ foreign currency transactions are substantially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts, so as to mitigate the possibility of significant foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

Extreme Networks enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the effect of gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are not designated as hedges under SFAS 133. At December 31, 2002, these exposures amounted to $2.0 million and were partially offset by foreign currency forward contracts with a notional principal amount of $2.0 million (fair value of approximately $108,000). These contracts were traded in the last month of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 45 days.

Extreme Networks also uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain operating expenses, denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. At December 31, 2002, these exposures amounted to $6.7 million and were partially offset by forward foreign currency contracts with a notional principal amount of $6.7 million (fair value of approximately $85,000). These contracts were traded in the last week of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 60 days.

Typically, changes in the fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts are offset largely by changes upon remeasurement of the underlying assets and liabilities. These contracts have original maturities ranging from one to three months.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for, but are not limited to, accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, depreciation and amortization, impairment of purchased intangible assets and minority investments, sales returns, warranty accruals and income taxes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), which superseded SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of (“SFAS 121”). Although retaining many of the fundamental recognition and measurement provisions of SFAS 121, the new rules significantly change the criteria that would have to be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale. The statement also supersedes certain provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations —Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, and requires expected future operating losses from discontinued operations to be displayed in discontinued operations in the period or periods in which the losses are incurred rather than as of the measurement date, as previously required. Extreme Networks adopted SFAS 144 on July 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a material impact on Extreme Networks’ consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 2002.

SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets be tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to the expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the assets, significant negative industry or economic trends and significant changes in Extreme Networks’ market capitalization relative to net book value. In the event of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, Extreme Networks will test such assets for a potential impairment. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to dispose of the affected assets.

Exit or Disposal Activities

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”). SFAS 146 requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS addresses costs associated with restructuring activities that are currently accounted for under Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The scope of SFAS 146 also covers termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement, costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease and costs to consolidate facilities. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Extreme Networks does not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material impact on its operating results or financial position.

Consideration Granted by Vendors

In November 2001, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products (“EITF 01-09”), which addresses the accounting for consideration given by a vendor to a customer. Extreme Networks adopted EITF 01-09 during fiscal 2002 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Guarantees

2002. Extreme Networks has determined that the requirements of FIN 45 apply to its accrued warranty, to a guarantee of a lease obligation of one of its contract manufacturers and to letters of credit issued under its line of credit. Extreme Networks has complied with the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002. The provisions for initial recognition and measurement are effective on a prospective basis for guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of a guarantor’s year-end. Extreme Networks has not yet determined the impact of the adoption of the recognition requirements criteria of FIN 45 on its results of operations or financial position.

3. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICY

Effective July 1, 2002, Extreme Networks changed its capitalization policy for property and equipment from $1,000 to $3,000. Since the original policy was put into place, Extreme Networks has increased its scale of operations. As a result, tracking assets less than $3,000 became impracticable. The impact of the change on the accompanying financial statements was not material for all periods presented.

Extreme Networks purchases assets manufactured by its competitors in order to evaluate their products. Extreme Networks’ policy in the past has been to depreciate these assets over three years. Extreme Networks has changed its estimate of the useful life of these assets to one year to match with the currently anticipated use of this equipment. The new one-year life will be applied prospectively to any competitive equipment purchased on or after October 1, 2002. The impact of the change on results of operations was not material for all periods presented.

4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND INVESTMENTS

During fiscal 2001, Extreme Networks acquired two privately held companies in which it previously held minority interests: Optranet, Inc. (“Optranet”), a developer of broadband access equipment, and Webstacks, Inc. (“Webstacks”), a developer of content switching equipment. A related party of Extreme Networks was a significant investor in Optranet at the time of Extreme Networks’ initial investment and the subsequent acquisition. In addition, a related party of Extreme Networks was a significant investor in Webstacks at the time of Extreme Networks’ initial investment and the subsequent acquisition. In connection with these acquisitions, Extreme Networks acquired all of the outstanding stock and assumed all of the outstanding stock options of the respective acquirees. Both acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations.

Extreme Networks recognized deferred stock-based compensation associated with unvested stock options issued to employees that were assumed in conjunction with the acquisition of Optranet and Webstacks. This amount is included as a component of stockholders’ equity and is being amortized ratably by charges to operations over the vesting period of the options. The amortization of stock-based compensation associated with the acquisition of Optranet was $1.6 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and was $3.4 million and $5.0 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amortization of stock-based compensation associated with the acquisition of Webstacks was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and was $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amortization of stock-based compensation relates to options awarded to employees in research and development.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, Extreme Networks determined that there was other than temporary impairment of some of the goodwill and purchased intangible assets related to these acquisitions. See Note 10.

5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Line of Credit

Extreme Networks has entered into a revolving line of credit for $10.0 million with a major lending institution. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at the bank’s prime rate. As of December 31, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this line of credit. The line of credit contains a provision for the issuance of letters of credit not to exceed the unused balance of the line. As of December 31, 2002, Extreme Networks had letters of credit totaling $1.7 million. The line of credit requires Extreme Networks to maintain specified financial covenants related to tangible net worth and liquidity with which Extreme Networks was in compliance as of December 31, 2002. The line of credit expires on November 30, 2003.

Leases

In June 2000, Extreme Networks entered into two operating lease agreements for approximately 16 acres of land and the accompanying 275,000 square feet of buildings to house its primary facility in Santa Clara, California (the “Property”). The two lease agreements provided Extreme Networks with the option to purchase the Property at any time during the lease term and required the purchase at the end of the lease term. In April 2002, Extreme Networks exercised the option to purchase the Property and title to the Property was transferred to it in May 2002. Extreme Networks was obligated to pay a total of $80.0 million for the Property. As part of the original lease transactions, $80.0 million of Extreme Networks’ investment securities served as collateral for specified obligations under the lease agreements. Extreme Networks transferred the $80.0 million of investment securities held as security for the lease obligations to the lessor as payment for the Property.

At the time of exercise of the option to purchase the Property, the appraised value of the land and buildings was $38.0 million. Extreme Networks recognized a charge, net of a $3.0 million improvement allowance, of $39.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The land and buildings are included on Extreme Networks’ consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2002.

As part of our business relationship with MCMS, Inc., the predecessor-in-interest to Plexus Corp., we entered into a $9.0 million operating equipment lease for manufacturing equipment in September 2000 with a third-party financing company; we, in turn, subleased the equipment to MCMS. The equipment lease with the third-party financing company requires us to make monthly payments through June 2010 and to maintain specified financial covenants related to profitability and our cash to debt ratio. The liability related to this lease is included in accrued commitments on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2002, we were not in compliance with the profitability covenant and obtained the necessary waiver and expect to be in compliance in future quarters.

Legal Proceedings

Beginning on July 6, 2001, multiple purported securities fraud class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases were consolidated and the litigation is now captioned as In re Extreme Networks, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 01-6143 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.).

On or about April 19, 2002, plaintiffs electronically served an amended complaint. The amended complaint is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased Extreme Networks’ common stock from April 8, 1999 through December 6, 2000. It names as defendants Extreme Networks; six of the its present and former officers; and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of Extreme Networks’ initial public offering and October 1999 secondary offering. Subsequently, plaintiffs and one of the individual defendants stipulated to a dismissal of that defendant without prejudice. The complaint alleges liability under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the registration statement for the offerings did not disclose that: (1) the underwriters had agreed to allow certain customers to purchase shares in the offerings in exchange for excess commissions paid to the underwriters; and (2) the underwriters had arranged for certain customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at predetermined prices. The Securities Act of 1933 allegations against Extreme Networks and its officers are made as to the secondary offering only. The amended complaint also alleges that false analyst reports were issued. No specific damages are claimed.

Extreme Networks is aware that similar allegations have been made in other lawsuits filed in the Southern District of New York challenging over 300 other initial public offerings and secondary offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. On July 15, 2002, Extreme Networks (and the other issuer defendants) filed a motion to dismiss. That motion was heard on November 1, 2002. Extreme Networks cannot assure you that it will prevail in the lawsuit. Failure to prevail could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the future.

On March 14, 2001, Nortel Networks, Inc. and Nortel Networks Limited (collectively, “Nortel”) filed suit against Extreme Networks in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 01-10443EFH (the “Case”). The complaint alleged willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,790,554; 5,490,252; 5,408,469; 5,398,245; 5,159,595 and 4,736,363, and sought, among other findings, a judgment against Extreme Networks for infringement of the six patents, which allegations Extreme Networks vigorously opposed. Following limited pre-trial discovery and negotiation, Extreme Networks and Nortel agreed on September 17, 2002 to a settlement of all claims. As part of the settlement, the parties agreed to a prospective five-year cross-license with respect to the patents covering technologies that were at issue in the Case. The Case was dismissed with prejudice on September 20, 2002.

Extreme Networks is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters, including the specific matters discussed above, is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on Extreme Networks’ consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

6. INCOME TAXES

Extreme Networks has recorded tax benefits of $13.2 million and $15.2 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002, respectively. The benefits for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 reflect effective tax rates of 40.0% and 38.3%, respectively, which differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the impact of research and experimentation credits and the tax impact of foreign operations.

7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following are the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (in thousands):

	December 31, 2002			June 30, 2002
Unrealized gain on investments	$	2,956		$	1,801
Change in fair value of derivatives		142			(113	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(7	)		163

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	3,091		$	1,851

The components of comprehensive loss, net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss	$	(19,739	)	$	(10,652	)	$	(24,470	)	$	(46,660	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized gain on investment, net		484			(345	)		1,155			412
Change in unrealized loss on derivatives		141			(158	)		255			(159	)
Change in accumulated translation adjustments		(123	)		(350	)		(170	)		(257	)

Total comprehensive loss	$	(19,237	)	$	(11,505	)	$	(23,230	)	$	(46,664	)

8. RESTRUCTURING CHARGE AND PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT WRITE-OFF

Restructuring

During the three months ended December 31, 2002, Extreme Networks recorded a restructuring charge of $14.2 million. The restructuring charge included excess facilities charges of $9.6 million, severance charges of $2.7 million and asset impairments of $1.9 million. The excess facilities charge represents an increase to the charge recognized during fiscal 2002 for the domestic and international facilities discussed below. The commercial real estate market has continued to deteriorate since the initial charge was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 necessitating an increase in reserves that take into consideration the unfavorable difference between lease obligation payments and projected sublease receipts. The severance charges related to a reduction in total staff during the quarter of approximately 100 people, or 10% of the total workforce, across all departments. The asset impairment charge relates to the write-off of leasehold improvements and office furniture related to excess facilities.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, Extreme Networks implemented a restructuring plan to lower its overall cost structure. Restructuring charges of $73.6 million included a $39.0 million charge related to the exit of two facility leases Extreme Networks entered into in June 2000, as described in Note 5 under the subheading “Leases.” The actual cost could differ from this estimate, and additional facilities charges could be incurred if Extreme Networks is unsuccessful in negotiating reasonable termination fees on certain facilities, if facility operating lease rental rates continue to decrease in these markets, if it takes longer than expected to find a suitable tenant to sublease these facilities, or if other estimates and assumptions change.

Excess facilities charges during the third quarter of fiscal 2002 were $25.4 million. These costs are the result of Extreme Networks’ decision to permanently reduce occupancy or vacate certain domestic and international facilities. The estimated facilities costs were based on current comparable rates for leases in the respective markets or estimated termination fees. Extreme Networks anticipates that it will continue to make cash outlays to meet lease obligations for these facilities in accordance with their terms, unless estimates and assumptions change or Extreme Networks is able to negotiate acceptable lease terminations prior to the anticipated termination dates for the applicable leases.

Asset impairments were $9.1 million for fiscal 2002. This charge represented the unamortized amount of the assets at the date a decision was made to discontinue use. These assets were not utilized subsequently or held for sale. They were either scrapped or abandoned.

Restructuring liabilities consist of (in thousands):

	Purchase of Leased Properties			Excess Facilities			Asset Impairments			Severance			Total
Charge in third quarter of fiscal 2002	$	39,000		$	25,432		$	9,138		$	—		$	73,570
Write-offs		—			—			(9,138	)		—			(9,138	)
Cash payments		(39,000	)		(2,011	)		—			—			(41,011	)

Balance at June 30, 2002		—			23,421			—			—			23,421
Charge in second quarter of fiscal 2003		—			9,576			1,893			2,718			14,187
Write-offs		—			—			(1,893	)		—			(1,893	)
Cash payments		—			(3,736	)		—			(2,718	)		(6,454	)

Balance at December 31, 2002	$	—		$	29,261		$	—		$	—		$	29,261

Property and equipment write-off

During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, Extreme Networks completed a property and equipment physical inventory in conjunction with the implementation of its new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. The property and equipment physical inventory resulted in the identification of $12.7 million of property and equipment that was either no longer in service or not identifiable and therefore was written off during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

9. PROVISION FOR INVENTORY

As a result of the rapid change in the market for networking products, Extreme Networks recorded $7.6 million and $39.2 million in charges for excess and obsolete inventory and non-cancelable purchase commitments in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. The following is a summary of these charges and their disposition from the third quarter of fiscal 2001 to December 31, 2002 (in thousands):

	Inventory Allowance			Inventory Benefit Realized
Initial excess inventory charge in the third quarter of fiscal 2001	$	39,205		$	—
Additional excess inventory charge in the first quarter of fiscal 2002		5,000			—

		44,205

Usage:
Inventory scrapped		(15,797	)		—
Sale of inventory		(5,154	)		4,776
Inventory internally utilized		(893	)		—
Settlement of purchase commitments		(15,437	)		—

		(37,281	)	$	4,776

Remaining balance as of December 31, 2002	$	6,924

10. IMPAIRMENT OF ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

In the third quarter of fiscal 2002, Extreme Networks recorded in operating expenses asset impairment charges totaling $89.8 million against certain acquired intangible assets and goodwill. The acquired intangible assets and goodwill that were impaired originated primarily from the acquisitions of Optranet in January 2001 and Webstacks in March 2001.

Optranet’s products were originally targeted at the building local exchange carrier (“BLEC”) and multi-tenant unit (“MTU”) markets. It was believed that, by incorporating Optranet’s technology into Extreme Networks’ Alpine product family, Extreme Networks would be able to expand its presence in customer networks and give metropolitan service providers an advanced Ethernet service-provisioning platform for Ethernet access over several transport systems. Extreme Networks believed it would be able to exploit the synergies and growth opportunities of Optranet’s in-process products due to their complementary nature to its strategy and compatibility with its products. However, following the acquisition date, demand for Optranet’s

products fell sharply as the majority of Optranet’s targeted customers either entered into bankruptcy or dissolved. Based on industry analysis, the BLEC and MTU markets are not expected to recover in the next few years, and in the event that a recovery eventually occurs, BLEC and MTU service providers will likely require different solutions. As of the impairment valuation date of March 31, 2002, the Optranet products were repositioned to address the remote and branch office access needs of enterprise customers. However, this secondary market has also slowed due to decreased information technology spending and has largely been addressed by competing products based on legacy technologies.

Webstacks’ products were originally targeted at the e-business and hosting facility markets. Extreme Networks acquired Webstacks in an effort to expand Extreme Networks’ IP services to provide robust Layer 4—Layer 7 switching solutions required for building high-performance content aware networks. Extreme Networks believed it would be able to exploit the growth opportunities of Webstacks’ products by complementing its Layer 3 product focus with high-end Layer 4—Layer 7 networking devices. However, demand for higher-cost Layer 4—Layer 7 switches in these markets did not materialize, largely due to worsening economic conditions. E-business customers continued to rely on slower speed networking devices and host facilities have not yet grown to a scale that necessitates data transfer at gigabit speeds. As of the impairment valuation date of March 31, 2002, the Webstacks products were repositioned to address enterprise data center needs, including security products. Although this market has slowed since the acquisition date, based on industry analysis, Extreme Networks believes there continues to be potential for moderate growth in this market.

Based on the foregoing impairment factors, Extreme Networks worked with valuation experts to perform asset impairment tests at the lowest operational level that had separately identifiable cash flows related to the Webstacks and Optranet intangible assets and goodwill. The tests were performed by comparing the expected undiscounted cash flows over 57-month periods for each of Webstacks and Optranet to the carrying amount of the long-lived assets resulting from the acquisitions. Extreme Networks found that the sum of the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the Webstacks and Optranet intangible assets and goodwill was less than their carrying value and thus it needed to record an impairment loss. The impairment loss was measured as the amount by which the carrying values of such assets exceeded their fair value. The fair value was calculated based on analyses of the discounted future cash flows for each of Webstacks and Optranet. In performing these analyses, Extreme Networks used the best information available under the circumstances, including reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections of future operating results. The discount rates used in the analyses were 20% for each of Webstacks and Optranet, which were based on historical risk premiums that investors required for companies of Extreme Networks’ size, industry and capital structure and included risk factors specific to the sectors in which the two companies operated. All of the assumptions used are based on management’s best estimate of future results. As a result of this analysis, Extreme Networks recorded a charge to reduce goodwill and purchased intangible assets by $89.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. A total of $1.0 million of carrying value of goodwill remained as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2002.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the following sections, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly statements relating to our expectations regarding results of operations, product demand and revenue, cash flows, product gross margins, our expectations to continue to develop new products and enhance existing products, our expectations regarding the amount of research and development expenses, our expectations relating to selling, general and administrative expenses, our efforts to achieve additional operating efficiencies and to review and improve our business systems and cost structure, our expectations to continue investing in technology, resources and infrastructure, our expectations concerning the availability of products from suppliers and contract manufacturers, anticipated product costs and sales prices, our expected effective income tax rate, our expectations that we have sufficient capital to meet our requirements for at least the next twelve months, our expectations regarding the rationalization of our workforce and facilities, and our expectations regarding materials and inventory management. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and the cautionary statements set forth below and those contained in the section entitled “Risk Factors” identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in any such forward-looking statements. We caution investors that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risk factors identified in this Form 10-Q and other filings we have made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period reported. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, market trends and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the critical accounting policies stated below, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

We derive the majority of our revenue from sales of our stackable and chassis-based networking equipment, with the remaining revenue generated from service fees relating to the maintenance and installation of, and training on, our products. Our revenue recognition policy follows SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. We generally recognize product revenue from our end user and reseller customers at the time of shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price of the product is fixed or determinable and collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured. When significant obligations or contingencies remain after products are delivered, such as installation or customer acceptance, revenue and related costs are deferred until such obligations or contingencies are satisfied. Revenue from service obligations under maintenance contracts is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual period, which typically range from one to three years. When we provide a combination of products and services to customers, revenue is allocated based on relative fair values.

We make certain sales to partners in two-tier distribution channels. The first tier consists of a limited number of independent distributors that sell primarily to resellers and, on occasion, to end-user customers. Under specified conditions, we grant the right to these distributors to return a portion of unsold inventory to us for the purpose of stock rotation. Therefore, we defer recognition of revenue on sales to these distributors until the distributors sell the product, as evidenced by a monthly sales-out report that each distributor provides us. Our decision to defer revenue on these sales until the distributors sell the product required judgment. Others, in similar circumstances, may conclude it is appropriate to recognize revenue on such sales upon delivery to the distributor. The second tier of the distribution channel consists of a large number of third-party resellers that sell directly to end users and are not granted return privileges, except for defective products.

We provide an allowance for sales returns based on our historical returns, analysis of credit memo data and our return policies. The allowance is charged to net revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. If the historical data used by us to calculate the estimated sales returns and allowances does not properly reflect future levels of product returns, these estimates would have to be modified, thus resulting in an impact to net revenue.

Inventories

The networking industry is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. We perform a detailed assessment of inventory at each balance sheet

date, which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements, product lifecycle and product development plans and quality issues. Based on this analysis, we record adjustments, when appropriate, to reflect inventory at net realizable value. In recent quarters, demand for our products has been adversely affected by the downturn in the global economy and reduced telecommunications and infrastructure capital spending, particularly in the United States. Although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments would significantly impact the value of our inventory and our reported operating results. In the future, if we find that our estimates are too optimistic and we determine that our inventory needs to be written down, we will be required to recognize such costs in our cost of revenue at the time of such determination. Conversely, if we find our estimates are too pessimistic and we subsequently sell product that has previously been written down, our operating margin in that period will be unusually favorable.

Warranty Reserves

Networking products can contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products or new versions or updates of existing products are released to the marketplace. We have experienced such errors in connection with products and product upgrades. Our hardware warranty period is typically 12 months from the date of shipment to end users and 14 months from the date of shipment to channel partners, which include resellers and distributors. Upon shipment of products to our customers, including both end users and channel partners, we estimate expenses for the cost to repair or replace products that may be returned under warranty and accrue the amount, as revenue is recognized. In addition, we estimate expenses for the cost to repair or replace products that may be returned under service agreements after the expiration of the warranty period as well as products returned or replaced at our discretion outside the warranty period and not covered by a separate service agreement. As a result, the charges to cost of revenue and expenses incurred include not only expenses associated with repairs or replacements during the warranty period but also amounts related to obligations under service contracts and amounts associated with discretionary repair or replacement programs. In future periods, these amounts will be more readily segregated as part of the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system.

Our determination of our warranty requirements is based on our actual historical experience with the product or product family, estimates of repair and replacement costs, and any product warranty problems that are identified after shipment. We adjust these accruals at each balance sheet date in accordance with changes in these factors. While we believe that our warranty accrual is adequate and that the judgments applied in calculating this accrual are appropriate, the assumptions used are based on estimates and estimated amounts could differ materially from our actual warranty expenses in the future. Changes in our accrued warranty account for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Balance beginning of period	$	12.1		$	6.2		$	9.1		$	3.0
Charges to cost of revenue for warranty and service contracts		5.9			5.7			15.5			16.8
Expenses incurred for warranty and service contracts		(7.8	)		(5.6	)		(16.4	)		(13.5	)
Change in estimate related to accrual warranty		—			—			2.0			—

Balance end of period	$	10.2		$	6.3		$	10.2		$	6.3

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We continually monitor and evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivables based on a combination of factors. We record specific allowances for bad debts in general and administrative expense when we become aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration of financial position. Estimates are used in determining our allowances for all other customers based on factors such as current trends in the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience. We mitigate some collection risk by requiring most of our customers in the Asia-Pacific region, excluding Japan, to pay cash in advance or secure letters of credit when placing an order with us. During the year ended June 30, 2002, we increased our allowance for doubtful accounts, reflecting the adverse economic conditions affecting our customer base. While we believe that our current allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is appropriate, a change in the financial condition of specific customers may result in further adjustment to our estimates of the recoverability of receivables.

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We make an assessment of the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent that recovery is not believed to be likely, a valuation allowance is established. For the six months ended December 31, 2002 and for fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, we did not record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets because we believed the amount was more likely than not to be realized. In the event that we are unable to realize some or all of the deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets will be charged to income in the period such determination is made.

Purchase Commitments

We currently have arrangements with two contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our products. Our arrangements allow them to procure long lead-time component inventory on our behalf based upon a rolling production forecast provided by us. We are obligated to the purchase of long lead-time component inventory that our contract manufacturers procure in accordance with the forecast, unless we give notice of order cancellation outside of applicable component lead-times. As of December 31, 2002, we were committed to purchase approximately $1.0 million of such inventory over the next four months. If actual demand for our products is below these projections, we may have excess inventory as a result of our purchase commitments of long lead-time components with our contract manufacturers. As a consequence, we may then need to record a charge to cost of revenue to reflect the impact of such excess purchase commitments.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

We assess the carrying value of long-lived assets, which includes property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to the expected historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends and significant changes in Extreme Networks’ market capitalization relative to net book value. In the event of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we would test such assets for a potential impairment. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to dispose of the affected assets.

Legal Contingencies

We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals, if any, are based only on the most current and dependable information available at any given time. As additional information becomes available, we may reassess the potential liability from pending claims and litigation and the probability of claims being successfully asserted against us. As a result, we may revise our estimates related to these pending claims and litigation. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows in the future. For further detail, see Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of legal proceedings.

Results of Operations

Net revenue. Net revenue decreased from $109.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $90.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $18.9 million. Net revenue decreased from $217.4 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $190.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $26.6 million. These decreases resulted from a decrease in our Japanese service provider business, unfavorable global economic conditions, a shift in product mix and reduced pricing due to competitive pressures. Net service revenue was $9.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and $9.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001. Net service revenue was $19.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and $15.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001. The increase in service revenues in the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001 was due to increased revenue related to service contracts offset partially by a decrease in revenue related to professional service contracts. Net service revenue is generally deferred and recognized ratably over the service period obligations, which typically range from one to three years.

For the six months ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, sales to customers outside of the United States accounted for approximately 60% and 68% of our net revenue, respectively. Sales in the United States for the six months ended December 31, 2001 were adversely affected as a result of the events of September 11, 2001. We experienced a decrease in our Japanese service provider business in the six months ended December 31, 2002. We expect that export sales will continue to represent a significant portion of net revenue, although export sales may decline as a percentage of net revenue. All sales transactions are currently denominated in United States dollars.

The United States economy has been experiencing a rapid and increasingly severe downturn during fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003. This adversely affected demand for our products and made it increasingly difficult to accurately forecast future

production requirements. Our revenue for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2003 was adversely impacted by the continuing weakness and uncertainty in the economies of the United States and other industrialized countries. While we expect this economic downturn to continue for the remainder of fiscal 2003, we cannot predict the extent, severity or length of this economic downturn in the United States or in the other geographic regions where we currently sell our products. Further, we expect that our revenue during calendar 2003 will be significantly affected by the timing and success of the introduction of new products during the calendar year.

We are experiencing some erosion of average selling prices of our products due to a number of factors, including competitive pricing pressures, promotional pricing and rapid technological change. Our revenue is derived primarily from sales of our Summit, BlackDiamond and Alpine product families and fees for services relating to the installation and maintenance of, and training on, our products. The level of sales to any customer may vary from period to period; however, we expect that significant customer concentration will continue for the foreseeable future. One distributor of Extreme Networks’ products accounted for 10% and 15% of our net revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. One distributor of Extreme Networks’ products accounted for 13% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2002. One distributor of Extreme Networks’ products and one end-user customer accounted for 16% and 10% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue, respectively, for the six months ended December 31, 2001.

Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue includes costs of raw materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead and amounts paid to third-party contract manufacturers, and other costs related to warranty and contractual obligations. Net revenue less cost of revenue (gross profit) decreased from $57.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $45.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $12.3 million. Gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net revenue) decreased from 52.8% for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to 50.2% for the three months ended December 31, 2002. These decreases in both the gross profit and gross margin were primarily due to unfavorable changes in gross margin contribution as a result of the decrease in our Japanese service provider business and a shift in product mix.

Gross profit increased from $82.6 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $94.4 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $11.8 million. Gross margin increased from 38.0% for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to 49.5% for the six months ended December 31, 2002. These increases in both the gross profit and the gross margin were primarily due to a $31.4 million charge in the three months ended September 30, 2001 related to our outsourced manufacturing activities, including a charge for leased equipment with one contract manufacturer as described below and the stocking of our service depots on a worldwide basis with inventory intended to meet customer support demands under contract. The increase attributable to the charge was offset partially by unfavorable changes in geographic gross margin contribution as well as a significant increase in warranty expense. During the six months ended December 31, 2002, we experienced a higher than normal rate of warranty expenses due to problems with several component parts within our products and our election, in some cases, to address these matters by replacing defective products with new products rather than refurbished replacements. We are in the process of implementing operational changes that are designed to reduce these expenses in the future, however, our gross margin will continue to be adversely affected until these new this processes are fully implemented.

Inventory purchases and commitments are based upon our forecast of future sales. To mitigate the component supply constraints that existed in fiscal 2001, we built inventory levels for certain components with long lead times and entered into long-term commitments with our suppliers for certain components. Due to a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products that became apparent in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, inventory levels, including non-cancelable purchase commitments, exceeded our requirements based on our forecast of expected demand. We recorded a provision for excess and obsolete inventory, including non-cancelable purchase commitments of $7.8 million, totaling $39.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2001. The $31.4 million excess inventory charge was calculated based on the inventory levels in excess of our forecast of expected demand for each product. Based on our then determined future demand forecast, we did not, and we currently do not, anticipate that the excess inventory subject to these provisions will be used at a later date. Furthermore, we may be required to take additional write-downs in the future related to excess inventory.

Our gross margin is variable and dependent on many factors, some of which are outside of our control. Some of the primary factors affecting gross margin include demand for our products, changes in our pricing policies and those of our competitors, and the mix of products sold. Our gross margin may be adversely affected by increases in material or labor costs, increases in warranty expense, heightened price competition, obsolescence charges and higher inventory balances. In addition, our gross margin may fluctuate due to the mix of distribution channels through which our products are sold, including the effects of our two-tier distribution model. Any significant decline in sales to our resellers, distributors or end-user customers, or the loss of any of our key resellers, distributors or end-user customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, an increase in distribution channels generally makes it more difficult to forecast

the mix of products sold and the timing of orders from our customers. New product introductions may result in excess or obsolete inventories, which may also reduce our gross margin. Furthermore, if we are not able to reduce product or related warranty costs in future quarters, gross margin would continue to be adversely affected.

Cost of revenue includes the cost of our manufacturing overhead. We outsource the majority of our manufacturing and supply chain management operations, and we conduct quality assurance, manufacturing engineering, document control and repairs at our facility in Santa Clara, California. Accordingly, a significant portion of our cost of revenue consists of payments to our contract manufacturers: Flextronics International, Ltd. located in San Jose, California and Guadalajara, Mexico and Plexus Corp. located in Nampa, Idaho and Penang, Malaysia. As part of our business relationship with MCMS, Inc., the predecessor-in-interest to Plexus Corp., in September 2000, we entered into a $9.0 million operating equipment lease for manufacturing equipment with a third-party financing company; we, in turn, subleased the equipment to MCMS. Due to the liquidity problems at MCMS and its voluntary bankruptcy filing for protection under Chapter 11 on September 18, 2001, we recorded a charge of $9.0 million related to the equipment lease in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. On January 8, 2002, MCMS completed an agreement to sell a majority of its assets to Plexus Corp. for $45.0 million.

We expect to realize lower per-unit product costs from our contract manufacturers as a result of volume efficiencies if and as production volumes increase. However, we do not know if or when such price reductions will occur. The failure to obtain these price reductions could have a material adverse effect upon our gross margin and operating results.

Sales, marketing and service expenses. Sales, marketing and service expenses consist of salaries, commissions and related expenses for personnel engaged in marketing, sales and customer support and service functions, as well as trade shows and promotional expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased from $35.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $30.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $5.3 million. Sales and marketing expenses decreased from $72.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $63.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $9.0 million. These decreases were primarily due to decreased payroll and related personnel expenses due to reduced headcount in sales and marketing, decreased depreciation and rent expense due to the restructuring charges and fixed asset write-offs in the three months ended December 31, 2002 and reduced spending for marketing programs. The rate of future spending increases in our sales, marketing and service expenses, if any, will depend on the pace of recovery in the market for networking products.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consist principally of salaries and related personnel expenses, consultant fees and prototype expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. Research and development expenses decreased from $14.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $13.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million. Research and development expenses decreased from $31.0 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $27.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $3.1 million. These decreases were primarily due to decreased depreciation and rent expense due to the restructuring charges and fixed asset write-offs in the three months ended December 31, 2002. We expense all research and development expenses as incurred. We believe that continued investment in research and development is critical to attaining our strategic objectives and as a result we expect these expenses will continue to be significant in future periods.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and administrative personnel, professional fees and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $6.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $6.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $0.7 million. This increase was due to increases in professional fees and insurance expense. General and administrative expenses decreased from $14.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $13.7 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $0.4 million. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.7 million charge in the three months ended September 30, 2001 for bad debt expense and decreased rent expense in the six months ended December 31, 2002 as a result of the restructuring charges, partially offset by increases in professional fees and insurance expense in the six months ended December 31, 2002. The rate of future spending increases in our general and administrative expenses, if any, will depend on the pace of recovery in the market for networking products.

Amortization of deferred stock compensation. Amortization of deferred stock compensation decreased from $2.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $1.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $0.9 million. Amortization of deferred stock compensation decreased from $5.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $3.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $1.7 million. Amortization of deferred stock compensation is attributable to unvested stock options issued to employees that we assumed in conjunction with the

acquisitions of Optranet and Webstacks and is being amortized ratably by charges to operations over the vesting period of the options.

Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangible assets. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”), as of July 1, 2002. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain other intangible assets will no longer be amortized and will instead be tested for impairment at least annually and written down only when impaired. Accordingly, as of July 1, 2002, we stopped amortizing goodwill with a carrying value of $1.0 million. The cessation of amortization reduced amortization of goodwill and amortization of purchased intangible assets by $11.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three months ended December 31, 2002 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2001. The cessation of amortization reduced amortization of goodwill and amortization of purchased intangible assets by $22.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively, for the six months ended December 31, 2002 as compared with the six months ended December 31, 2001.

Restructuring. During the three months ended December 31, 2002, we recorded a restructuring charge of $14.2 million. The restructuring charge included excess facilities charges of $9.6 million, severance charges of $2.8 million and asset impairments of $1.8 million. The excess facilities charge represents an increase to the charge recognized during the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The commercial real estate market has continued to deteriorate since the initial charge was taken in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 necessitating an increase in reserves that take into consideration the unfavorable difference between lease obligation payments and projected sublease receipts. The severance charges were related to a reduction in total staff of approximately 100 people, or 10% of the total workforce, across all departments. The asset impairment charge relates to the write-off of leasehold improvements and office furniture related to excess facilities. As a result of these charges, our expense levels will be lowered in future quarters.

Property and equipment write-off. During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we completed a property and equipment inventory in conjunction with the implementation of our new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. The property and equipment inventory resulted in the identification of $12.7 million of property and equipment that was written off during the second quarter of fiscal 2003. As a result of this charge, depreciation expense will be lower in future quarters.

Loss on investments. Loss on investments was $6.0 million for the six months ended December 30, 2001. Extreme Networks monitors its minority equity investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary. No impairment write-downs were recorded during the six months ended December 31, 2002.

Other income, net. Other income, net decreased from $1.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2001 to $1.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $0.7 million. Other income, net decreased from $4.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to $1.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2002, a decrease of $2.2 million. This decrease was due to lower interest rates on our available investment balances and increased interest expense on the convertible subordinated notes issued in December 2001 and amortization of costs associated with those notes.

Income taxes. We recorded tax benefits of $13.2 million and $15.2 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002, respectively. The benefits for the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 results in effective tax rates of 40.0% and 38.3%, respectively, which differ from the statutory rate primarily due to the impact of research and experimentation credits and the tax impact of foreign operations. SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not. We continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities increased from $400.1 million at June 30, 2002 to $405.9 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of $5.8 million. This increase was primarily due to cash provided by operating activities of $14.2 million and proceeds from issuance of common stock of $2.0 million, partially offset by capital expenditures of $11.6 million.

We generated $14.2 million in cash from operations in the six months ended December 31, 2002 despite a net loss of $24.5 million. The net loss included non-cash charges, offset somewhat by the effect of deferred taxes. Accounts receivable decreased significantly from $51.3 million at June 30, 2002 to $21.7 million at December 31, 2002. Days sales outstanding in receivables decreased to a historical low of 22 days at December 31, 2002 from 41 days at June 30, 2002. The decreases in accounts receivable and days sales outstanding were primarily due to shipment linearity and improved collections performance. We do not believe this level of days sales outstanding is sustainable in the long term and expect days sales outstanding to increase toward more normal historical levels in the future. Inventory levels increased from $24.6 million at June 30, 2002 to $28.0 million at December 31, 2002. Inventory management remains an area

of focus as we balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times and avoid stock-outs with the risk of inventory excess or obsolescence caused by, among other things, declining demand, rapidly changing technology and customer requirements. Any significant increase in our inventory levels can be expected to reduce cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities.

We have a revolving line of credit for $10.0 million with Silicon Valley Bank. As of December 31, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility. The line of credit contains a provision for the issuance of letters of credit not to exceed the unused balance of the line of credit. As of December 31, 2002, we had letters of credit totaling $1.7 million. The line of credit requires us to maintain specified financial covenants related to tangible net worth and liquidity with which we were in compliance as of December 31, 2002. The line of credit expires on November 30, 2003. It is our intention to renew this line of credit when it expires.

In December 2001, we completed a private placement of $200.0 million of convertible subordinated notes. The notes mature on December 1, 2006. Interest is payable semi-annually at 3.5% per annum. The notes are convertible at the option of the holders into our common stock at an initial conversion price of $20.96 per share, subject to adjustment. The notes are redeemable in cash at our option at an initial redemption price of 101.4% of the principal amount on or after December 2004 if not converted to common stock prior to the redemption date. Each holder of the notes has the right to cause us to repurchase all of such holder’s convertible notes at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest upon a change of control of ownership of Extreme Networks, as defined in the offering circular.

The following summarizes our contractual obligations (including interest payments) at December 31, 2002, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):

	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		After 3 Years
Contractual Obligations:
Convertible subordinated notes	$	228,000	$	7,000	$	14,000	$	207,000
Non-cancelable operating lease obligations		55,248		9,612		18,262		27,374

Total contractual cash obligations	$	283,248	$	16,612	$	32,262	$	234,374

We did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures or non-cancelable purchase commitments as of December 31, 2002.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (“FIN 45”). FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The disclosure provisions of FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods that end after December 15, 2002. We have determined that the requirements of FIN 45 apply to our accrued warranty, to a guarantee of a lease obligation of one of our contract manufacturers and to letters of credit issued under our line of credit. We have complied with the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002. The provisions for initial recognition and measurement are effective on a prospective basis for guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002, irrespective of a guarantor’s year-end. We have not yet determined the impact of the adoption of the recognition requirements criteria of FIN 45 on our results of operations or financial position.

We require substantial capital to fund our business, particularly to finance inventories and accounts receivable and for capital expenditures. As a result, we could be required to raise substantial additional capital at any time. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our

operations. If we are unable to obtain such additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, marketable securities and cash available from credit facilities and future operations will enable us to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.

Risk Factors

We Are Not Profitable and We Cannot Assure You That We Will Be Profitable in the Future

Fiscal 2000 was the only year in which we have achieved profitability. We reported a loss for fiscal 2002, fiscal 2001 and for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2003. We anticipate continuing to incur significant sales, marketing and service, product development and general and administrative expenses and, as a result, we will continue to need to rationalize expense levels and increase revenue levels to achieve profitability in future fiscal quarters.

A Number of Factors Could Cause Our Quarterly Financial Results to Be Worse Than Expected, Resulting in a Decline in Our Stock Price

Our failure to control our operating expenses at a level that is consistent with anticipated revenue may cause our financial results to be worse than expected. A high percentage of our expenses are fixed in the short term, so any delay in generating or recognizing revenue could cause our quarterly operating results to fall below the expectations of public market analysts or investors, which could cause the price of our stock to fall.

We may experience a delay in generating or recognizing revenue for a number of reasons. Orders at the beginning of each quarter do not equal expected revenue for that quarter and are generally cancelable at any time. Accordingly, we are dependent upon obtaining orders during a quarter and shipping those orders in the same quarter to achieve our revenue objectives. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003 we did not receive enough product orders during the quarter to meet our revenue expectations for the quarter, and we reported a loss for the quarter. In addition, the timing of product releases and purchase orders, in addition to product availability, often results in a majority of our product shipments being scheduled near the end of a quarter. Failure to ship these products by the end of a quarter may adversely affect our operating results. Our customer agreements generally allow customers to delay scheduled delivery dates or to cancel orders within specified timeframes without significant charges to the customers. Furthermore, some of our customers require that we provide installation or inspection services that may delay the recognition of revenue for both products and services, and some of our customer agreements include acceptance provisions that prevent our ability to recognize revenue upon shipment.

Our quarterly revenue and operating results have varied significantly in the past and may vary significantly in the future due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

•

changes in general and/or specific economic conditions in the networking industry;

•

seasonal fluctuations in demand for our products and services, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Europe;

•

linearity of quarterly sales have historically reflected a pattern in which a disproportionate percentage of such sales occur in the last month of the quarter;

•

reduced visibility into the implementation cycles for our products and our customers’ spending plans;

•

our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products, which in the case of lower-than-expected sales, may result in excess or obsolete inventory in addition to non-cancelable purchase commitments for component parts;

•

product returns or the cancellation or rescheduling of orders;

•

our ability to develop, introduce, ship and support new products and product enhancements and manage product transitions;

•

announcements and new product introductions by our competitors;

•

our ability to develop and support relationships with enterprise customers, service providers and other potential large customers;

•

our ability to achieve targeted cost reductions;

•

our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of sole- or limited-source components for our products on a timely basis;

•

increases in the prices of the components that we purchase;

•

decreases in the prices of the products that we sell;

•

our ability to achieve and maintain desired production volumes and quality levels for our products;

•

the mix of products sold and the mix of distribution channels through which products are sold;

•

downward adjustments resulting from other-than-temporary declines in the carrying value of long-lived assets;

•

costs associated with adjustments to the size of our operations;

•

costs relating to possible acquisitions and the integration of technologies or businesses; and

•

the effect of amortization of deferred compensation and purchased intangibles resulting from existing or new transactions.

Due to the foregoing factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance.

Intense Competition in the Market for Networking Equipment Could Prevent Us from Increasing Revenue and Returning to Profitability

The market for networking equipment is intensely competitive. Our principal competitors include Cisco Systems, Enterasys Networks, Foundry Networks, Nortel Networks and Riverstone Networks. In addition, a number of private companies have announced plans for new products, or have introduced products, that may compete with our own products. Some of our current and potential competitors have superior market leverage, longer operating histories and substantially greater financial, technical, sales and marketing resources, in addition to wider name recognition and larger installed customer bases. These competitors may have developed, or may in the future develop, new competing products based on technologies that compete with our own products or render our products obsolete. Furthermore, a number of these competitors may merge or form strategic partnerships that enable them to offer or bring to market competitive products.

The pricing policies of our competitors impact the overall demand for our products and services. Some of our competitors are capable of operating at significant losses for extended periods of time, increasing pricing pressure on our products and services. If we do not maintain competitive pricing, the demand for our products and services, as well as our market share, may decline. From time to time, in responding to competitive pressures, we lower the prices of our products and services. When this happens, if we are unable to reduce our component costs or improve operating efficiencies, our revenues and margins are adversely affected.

To remain competitive, we believe that we must, among other things, invest significant resources in developing new products, improve our current products and maintain customer satisfaction. Such investment will increase our expenses and affect our profitability. In addition, if we fail to make this investment, we may not be able to compete successfully with our competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and future profitability.

If Our Products Contain Undetected Software or Hardware Errors, We Could Incur Significant Unexpected Expenses and Lose Sales

Network products frequently contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products or new versions or updates of existing products are first released to the marketplace. In the past, we have experienced such errors in connection with new products and product upgrades. We have experienced two component problems which caused us to incur unexpected costs and expenses and take an accrual for anticipated expenses. Our fiscal results for 2002 and for at least the first two quarters of fiscal 2003 were adversely affected by such expenses. In the future, we expect that, from time to time, such errors or component failures will be found in new or existing products after the commencement of commercial shipments including in the components we incorporate in our products. These problems may have a material adverse effect on our business by causing us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of our engineering personnel from new product development efforts, delaying the recognition of revenue and causing significant customer relations problems. Further, if product is not accepted by customers due to such defects, and such returns exceed the amount we accrued for defect returns based on our historical experience, our operating results would be adversely affected.

Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. The occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether or not caused by our products, could result in the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and any necessary revisions may cause us to incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We Depend Upon International Sales for a Significant Portion of Our Revenue and Our Ability to Grow Our International Sales Depends on Successfully Expanding Our International Operations

International sales constitute a significant portion of our net revenue. Our ability to grow will depend in part on the continued expansion of international sales. Sales to customers outside of the United States accounted for approximately 60% and 68% of our net revenue, respectively, for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. Our international sales primarily depend on the success of our resellers and distributors. The failure of our resellers and distributors to sell our products internationally would limit our ability to sustain and grow our revenue. There are a number of risks arising from our international business, including:

•

longer accounts receivable collection cycles;

•

difficulties in managing operations across disparate geographic areas;

•

difficulties associated with enforcing agreements through foreign legal systems;

•

the payment of operating expenses in local currencies, which exposes us to risks of currency fluctuations;

•

difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property;

•

political and economic turbulence;

•

potential adverse tax consequences; and

•

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, including compliance with U.S. and foreign export laws and regulations.

In addition, conducting our business on a global basis subjects us to a number of frequently changing and complex trade protection measures and import or export regulatory requirements. Our failure to comply with these measures and regulatory requirements may result in the imposition of financial penalties and restrictions on our ability to conduct business in and with certain countries, which may harm our business and damage our reputation. Pursuant to regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce providing for voluntary disclosure, we have disclosed information regarding a possible violation of certain export regulations. Following such disclosures the Department of Commerce will determine whether to conduct an investigation. If an investigation is commenced, we believe that these matters will be resolved without a material adverse effect on our business, and we are implementing procedures to reduce the risk of violations in the future.

Our international sales currently are U.S. dollar-denominated. As a result, increases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets. In the future, we may elect to invoice some of our international customers in local currency which will expose us to fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the particular local currency.

If we do so, we may decide to engage in hedging transactions to minimize the risk of such fluctuations. We have entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the impact of payment of operating expenses in local currencies to some of our operating foreign subsidiaries. However, if we are not successful in managing these hedging transactions, we could incur losses from hedging activities.

We Expect the Average Selling Prices of Our Products to Decrease, Which May Reduce Gross Margin or Revenue

The network equipment industry has traditionally experienced a rapid erosion of average selling prices due to a number of factors, including competitive pricing pressures, promotional pricing and technological progress. In addition, companies have lowered their prices in order to liquidate excess inventory that has accumulated as a result of the current economic slowdown. We anticipate that the average selling prices of our products will decrease in the future in response to competitive pricing pressures, excess inventories, increased sales discounts and new product introductions by us or our competitors, including, for example, competitive products manufactured with low-cost merchant silicon. We may experience substantial decreases in future operating results due to the erosion of our average selling prices. Competitive pressures are expected to increase as a result of the industry slowdown that began in the first half of 2001, coupled with the recent downturn in the broader economy. To maintain our gross margin, we must develop and introduce on a timely basis new products and product enhancements and continually reduce our product costs. Our failure to do so would likely cause our revenue and gross margins to decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Some of Our Customers May Not Have the Resources to Pay for Our Products as a Result of the Current Economic Environment

With the current economic slowdown, some of our customers are forecasting that their revenue for the foreseeable future will generally be lower than originally anticipated. Some of these customers are experiencing, or are likely to experience, serious cash flow problems and, as a result, may find it increasingly difficult to obtain financing, if financing is available at all. If some of these customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or securing alternate financing arrangements, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, the amounts that they owe us. Furthermore, they may not order as many

products from us as originally forecast, or cancel orders with us entirely. The inability of some of our potential customers to pay us for our products may adversely affect our cash flow, the timing of our revenue recognition and the amount of revenue, which may cause our stock price to decline.

The Market in Which We Compete is Subject to Rapid Technological Progress and to Compete We Must Continually Introduce New Products that Achieve Broad Market Acceptance

The network equipment market is characterized by rapid technological progress, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. If we do not regularly introduce new products in this dynamic environment, our product lines will become obsolete. Developments in routers and routing software could also significantly reduce demand for our products. Alternative technologies could achieve widespread market acceptance and displace the Ethernet technology on which we have based our product architecture. We cannot assure you that our technological approach will achieve broad market acceptance or that other technologies or devices will not supplant our own products and technology.

When we announce new products or product enhancements that have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycle of our existing products, customers may defer or cancel orders for our existing products. These actions could have a material adverse effect on our operating results by unexpectedly decreasing sales, increasing inventory levels of older products and exposing us to greater risk of product obsolescence. The market for switching products is evolving and we believe our ability to compete successfully in this market is dependent upon the continued compatibility and interoperability of our products with products and architectures offered by other vendors. In particular, the networking industry has been characterized by the successive introduction of new technologies or standards that have dramatically reduced the price and increased the performance of switching equipment. To remain competitive, we need to introduce products in a timely manner that incorporate, or are compatible with, these emerging technologies. We are particularly dependent upon the successful introduction of new products in calendar year 2003. We cannot assure you that any new products we introduce will be commercially successful. We have experienced delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the past that resulted in lower quarterly revenue than anticipated. We may experience similar delays in product development and releases in the future, and any delay in product introduction could adversely affect our ability to compete, causing our operating results to be below our expectations or the expectations of public market analysts or investors.

Our Limited Ability to Protect Our Intellectual Property and Defend Against Claims May Adversely Affect Our Ability to Compete

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. However, we cannot assure you that the actions we have taken will adequately protect our intellectual property rights or that other parties will not independently develop similar or competing products that do not infringe on our patents. We enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise misappropriate or use our products or technology.

Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. We are actively involved in disputes and licensing discussions with others regarding their claimed proprietary rights and cannot assure you that we will always successfully defend ourselves against such claims. If we are found to infringe the proprietary rights of others, or if we otherwise settle such claims, we could be compelled to pay damages or royalties and either obtain a license to those intellectual property rights or alter our products so that they no longer infringe upon such proprietary rights. Any license could be very expensive to obtain or may not be available at all. Similarly, changing our products or processes to avoid infringing the rights of others may be costly or impractical. Litigation resulting from claims that we are infringing the proprietary rights of others could result in substantial costs and a diversion of resources, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We May Become Engaged in Litigation Regarding Intellectual Property Rights, and an Adverse Outcome Could Harm Our Business and Require Us to Incur Significant Costs

We have received notice from several major companies alleging that we are infringing their patents. Without regard to the merits of any of these claims, if judgments by a court of law on any claim received in the future were to be upheld, or if we

otherwise agree to the settlement of such claims, the consequences to us may be severe and could require us to, among other actions:

•

stop selling our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;

•

obtain a royalty bearing license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or available at all;

•

pay damages; or

•

redesign those products that use the disputed technology.

If we are compelled to take any of the foregoing actions, our business could be severely harmed.

Adjustments to the Size of Our Operations May Require Us to Incur Unanticipated Costs

Prior to the quarter ended March 31, 2001, we experienced rapid growth and expansion that placed, and may in the future place, a significant strain on our resources. Subsequent to that period, we have from time to time incurred unanticipated costs to downsize our operations to a level consistent with downward forecasts in sales. Even if we manage the current period of instability effectively, as well as possible expansion in the future, we may make mistakes in restructuring or operating our business such as inaccurate sales forecasting or incorrect material planning. Any of these mistakes may lead to unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results. We cannot assure you that we will be able to size our operations in accordance with growth or decline of our business in the future.

Delays in the Implementation of New Management Information Systems May Cause a Significant Burden on Our Operations

We are implementing additional management information systems and developing further operating, administrative, financial and accounting systems and controls to improve and maintain close coordination among our executive, engineering, accounting, finance, marketing, sales and operations organizations. In addition, we recently completed the transition to a new enterprise resource planning system. We may be unable to operate our control systems in an efficient manner, and our current or planned personnel systems, procedures, and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. The difficulties associated with designing and implementing these new systems, procedures, and controls may place a significant burden on our management and our internal resources. In addition, as we grow internationally, we will need to expand our worldwide operations and enhance our communications infrastructure. Any delay in the implementation of such new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, or any disruption in the transition to such new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, could adversely affect our ability to accurately forecast sales demand, manage our supply chain, and record and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis.

We Must Continue to Develop and Increase the Productivity of Our Indirect Distribution Channels to Increase Net Revenue and Improve Our Operating Results

Our distribution strategy focuses primarily on developing and increasing the productivity of our indirect distribution channels through resellers and distributors. If we fail to develop and cultivate relationships with significant resellers, or if these resellers are not successful in their sales efforts, sales of our products may decrease and our operating results could suffer. Many of our resellers also sell products from other vendors that compete with our products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into additional reseller and/or distribution agreements or that we will be able to successfully manage our product sales channels. Our failure to do any of these could limit our ability to grow or sustain revenue. In addition, our operating results will likely fluctuate significantly depending on the timing and amount of orders from our resellers. We cannot assure you that our resellers and/or distributors will continue to market or sell our products effectively or continue to devote the resources necessary to provide us with effective sales, marketing and technical support.

Most of Our Revenue is Derived From Sales of Three Product Families, So We are Dependent on Widespread Market Acceptance of These Products

During the three months ended December 31, 2002, we derived substantially all of our revenue from sales of our Summit, BlackDiamond and Alpine products and related services. We expect that revenue from these product families will account for a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, widespread market acceptance of our product families is vital to our future success. Factors that may affect the sales of our products, some of which are beyond our control, include:

•

the demand for switching products (Gigabit Ethernet and Layer 3 switching technologies in particular) in the enterprise and service provider markets;

•

the performance, price and total cost of ownership of our products;

•

the availability and price of competing products and technologies;

•

our ability to match supply with demand for certain products; and

•

the success and development of our resellers, distributors and field sales channels.

We may not be able to achieve widespread market acceptance of our product families, which could reduce our revenue.

Future Performance will Depend on the Introduction and Acceptance of New Products

Our future performance will also depend on the successful development, introduction, and market acceptance of new and enhanced products that address customer requirements in a timely and cost-effective manner. In particular, we are dependent upon the successful introduction of new products in calendar year 2003. In the past, we have experienced delays in product development and such delays may occur in the future. We are currently engaged in development of a third-generation chipset planned for use in future products. The introduction of new and enhanced products may cause our customers to defer or cancel orders for existing products. Therefore, to the extent customers defer or cancel orders in the expectation of new product releases, any delay in the development or introduction of new products could cause our operating results to suffer. The inability to achieve and maintain widespread levels of market acceptance for our current and future products may significantly impair our revenue growth.

If a Key Reseller, Distributor, or Other Significant Customer Cancels or Delays a Large Purchase, Our Net Revenue May Decline and the Price of Our Stock May Fall

To date, a limited number of resellers, distributors and other customers have accounted for a significant portion of our revenue. If any of our large customers stop or delay purchases, our revenue and profitability would be adversely affected. For example, one distributor of Extreme Networks’ products accounted for 13% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and one distributor of Extreme Networks’ products and one end-user customer accounted for 16% and 10% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue, respectively, for the six months ended December 31, 2001. Our expense levels are based on our expectations as to future revenue and to a large extent are fixed in the short term, so a substantial reduction or delay in sales of our products to a significant reseller, distributor or other customer could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Although our largest customers may differ from period-to-period, we anticipate that our operating results for any given period will continue to depend to a significant extent on large orders from a relatively small number of customers, particularly in view of the relatively high per unit sales price of our products and long sales cycles.

While our financial performance depends on large orders from a limited number of key resellers, distributors and other significant customers, we do not have binding purchase commitments from any of them. For example:

•

our service providers and enterprise customers can stop purchasing, and our resellers and distributors can stop marketing, our products at any time;

•

our reseller agreements are non-exclusive and are for one-year terms, with no obligation upon the resellers to renew the agreements; and

•

our reseller, distributor and end-user customer agreements generally do not require minimum purchases.

Under specified conditions, some third-party distributors are allowed to return products to us. We do not recognize revenue on sales to distributors until the distributors sell the product to their customers.

The Sales Cycle for Our Products is Long and We May Incur Substantial Non-Recoverable Expenses or Devote Significant Resources to Sales that Do Not Occur When Anticipated

The use of indirect sales channels may contribute to the length and variability of our sales cycle. Our products have a relatively high per unit sales price, and the purchase of our products often constitutes a significant strategic decision by a customer regarding its communications infrastructure. The decision by customers to purchase our products is often based on the results of a variety of internal procedures associated with the evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance of new technologies. Accordingly, the product evaluation process frequently results in a lengthy sales cycle, typically ranging from three months to longer than a year, and as a result, our ability to sell products is subject to a number of significant risks, including:

•

the risk that budgetary constraints and internal acceptance reviews by customers will result in the loss of potential sales;

•

the risk of substantial variation in the length of the sales cycle from customer to customer, making decisions on the expenditure of resources difficult to assess;

•

the risk that we may incur substantial sales, marketing and service expenses and expend significant management time in an attempt to initiate or increase the sale of products to customers, but not succeed;

•

the risk that, if a sales forecast from a specific customer for a particular quarter is not achieved in that quarter, we may be unable to compensate for the shortfall, which could harm our operating results; and

•

the risk that downward pricing pressures could occur during this lengthy sales cycle.

We Purchase Several Key Components for Products From Single or Limited Sources and Could Lose Sales if These Suppliers Fail to Meet Our Needs

We currently purchase several key components used in the manufacture of our products from single or limited sources and are dependent upon supply from these sources to meet our needs. Certain components such as tantalum capacitors, static random access memory, or SRAM, and printed circuit boards have been, and may be in the future, in short supply. We have in the past, and are likely in the future, to encounter shortages and delays in obtaining these or other components, and this could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet customer orders. Our principal sole-source components include:

•

ASICs;

•

microprocessors;

•

programmable integrated circuits;

•

selected other integrated circuits;

•

custom power supplies; and

•

custom-tooled sheet metal.

Our principal limited-source components include:

•

flash memories;

•

dynamic and static random access memories, or DRAMs and SRAMs, respectively; and

•

printed circuit boards.

We use our forecast of expected demand to determine our material requirements. Lead times for materials and components we order vary significantly, and depend on factors such as the specific supplier, contract terms and demand for a component at a given time. If forecasts exceed orders, we may have excess and/or obsolete inventory on hand or under non-cancelable purchase commitments that could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. If orders exceed forecasts, we may have inadequate inventory of certain materials and components, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. We do not have agreements fixing long-term prices or minimum volume requirements from these suppliers. From time to time we have experienced shortages and allocations of certain components, resulting in delays in filling orders. Qualifying new suppliers to compensate for such shortages may be time-consuming and costly, and may increase the likelihood of errors in design or production. In addition, during the development of our products, we have experienced delays in the prototyping of our ASICs, which in turn has led to delays in product introductions. We cannot assure you that similar delays will not occur in the future. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that the performance of the components as incorporated in our products will meet the quality requirements of our customers.

Our Dependence on Contract Manufacturers for Substantially All of Our Manufacturing Requirements Could Harm Our Operating Results

If the demand for our products grows, we will need to increase our material purchases, contract manufacturing capacity, and internal test and quality functions. Any disruptions in product flow could limit our revenue, adversely affect our competitive position and reputation, and result in additional costs or cancellation of orders under agreements with our customers.

We rely on independent contractors to manufacture our products. We do not have long-term contracts with any of these manufacturers. We currently utilize two companies for the manufacture of our products – Flextronics International, Ltd., located in San Jose, California and Guadalajara, Mexico and Plexus Corp., located in Nampa, Idaho and Penang, Malaysia. We have experienced delays in product shipments from contract manufacturers in the past, which in turn delayed product shipments to our customers. Similar or other problems may arise in the future, such as products of inferior quality, insufficient

quantity of products, or the interruption or discontinuance of operations of a manufacturer, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We do not know whether we will effectively manage our contract manufacturers or that these manufacturers will meet our future requirements for timely delivery of products of sufficient quality and quantity. We intend to transition the manufacture of some of our products from one contract manufacturer to another. We also intend to regularly introduce new products and product enhancements, which will require that we rapidly achieve volume production by coordinating our efforts with those of our suppliers and contract manufacturers. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of high-quality products, or a reduction in the number of our contract manufacturers may cause a delay in our ability to fulfill orders and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

As part of our cost-reduction efforts, we will need to realize lower per unit product costs from our contract manufacturers by means of volume efficiencies and the utilization of manufacturing sites in lower-cost geographies. However, we cannot be certain when or if such price reductions will occur. The failure to obtain such price reductions would adversely affect our gross margins and operating results.

Future Changes in Financial Accounting Standards May Cause Adverse Unexpected Revenue Fluctuations and Affect Our Reported Results of Operations

A change in accounting policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred with frequency and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business.

Compliance with Changing Regulation of Corporate Governance and Public Disclosure May Result in Additional Expenses

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and Nasdaq Stock Market rules, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we intend to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

We Have Been Named as a Defendant in a Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit Arising Out of Our Public Offerings of Securities in 1999. If We Do Not Prevail in This Lawsuit, Our Business May Suffer

Beginning on July 6, 2001, purported securities fraud class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases were consolidated and the litigation is now captioned as In re Extreme Networks, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 01-6143 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.).

On or about April 19, 2002, plaintiffs electronically served an amended complaint. The amended complaint is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased Extreme Networks’ common stock from April 8, 1999 through December 6, 2000. It names as defendants Extreme Networks; six of the its present and former officers; and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of Extreme Networks’ initial public offering and October 1999 secondary offering. The complaint alleges liability under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the registration statement for the offerings did not disclose that: (1) the underwriters had agreed to allow certain customers to purchase shares in the offerings in exchange for excess commissions paid to the underwriters; and (2) the underwriters had arranged for certain customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at predetermined prices. The Securities Act of 1933 allegations against Extreme Networks and its officers are made as to the secondary offering only. The amended complaint also alleges that false analyst reports were issued. No specific damages are claimed.

We are aware that similar allegations have been made in other lawsuits filed in the Southern District of New York challenging over 300 other initial public offerings and secondary offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. On July 15, 2002, we (and the other issuer defendants) filed a motion to dismiss. That motion was heard on November 1, 2002. We cannot assure you that

we will prevail in the lawsuit. Failure to prevail could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the future.

In addition, we may become subject to other types of litigation in the future. Litigation is often expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

We and Manufacturers of Our Products Rely on a Continuous Supply of Power to Conduct Operations, and an Energy Crisis Could Disrupt Our Business and Increase Our Expenses

California experienced an energy crisis in 2001. The recurrence of an energy crisis could disrupt our operations and increase our expenses. In the event of an acute power shortage, which occurs when power reserves for California fall below 1.5%, electricity providers have on some occasions implemented, and may in the future continue to implement, rolling blackouts. Two of the manufacturers of our products, Flextronics and Solectron, are located in California. In the event of an energy crisis, these contractors may be unable to manufacture sufficient quantities of our products to meet our needs, or they may increase the fees charged for their services. We do not have long-term contracts with either Flextronics or Solectron. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of products would cause a delay in our ability to fulfill our orders, which could harm our business, and any increase in their fees could adversely affect our financial condition.

In addition, the majority of our operations are located in California. We currently do not have backup generators or alternate sources of power in the event of a blackout. If blackouts interrupt our power supply, we would temporarily be unable to continue operations at our facilities. Any such interruption in our ability to continue operations at these facilities could damage our reputation, harm our ability to retain existing customers and to obtain new customers, and could result in lost revenue, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operation.

Our Headquarters Are Located in Northern California and Certain of Our Contract Manufacturers Are Located Where Disasters May Occur That Could Disrupt Our Operations and Harm Our Business

Our corporate headquarters are located in Silicon Valley in Northern California. Historically, this region has been vulnerable to natural disasters and other risks, such as earthquakes, fires and floods, which at times have disrupted the local economy and posed physical risks to our property. We have contract manufacturers located in Northern California and in Mexico where similar natural disasters and other risks may disrupt the local economy and pose physical risks to our property and the property of our manufacturers.

In addition, terrorist acts or acts of war targeted at the United States, and specifically Silicon Valley, could cause damage or disruption to us, our employees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors and resellers, and customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

We currently do not have redundant, multiple site capacity in the event of a natural disaster or catastrophic event. In the event of such an occurrence, our business would suffer.

If We Lose Key Personnel or are Unable to Hire Additional Qualified Personnel as Necessary, We May Not Be Able to Successfully Manage Our Business or Achieve Our Goals

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key management, engineering, sales, marketing and service and operations personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not have employment contracts with these individuals nor do we carry life insurance on any of our key personnel.

We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, engineering, sales, marketing and service, finance and operations personnel. The market for these personnel is competitive, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area, and we have had difficulty hiring employees, particularly engineers, in the timeframe we desire. In addition, retention has become more difficult for us and other public technology companies as a result of the stock market decline, which caused the price of many of our employees’ stock options to be above the current market price of our stock. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring desired personnel, particularly engineers and sales personnel, could make it difficult for us to manage our business and meet key objectives, such as new product introductions. In addition, companies in the networking industry whose employees accept positions with competitors frequently claim that competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We have from time to time been involved in claims like this with other companies and, although to date they have not resulted in material litigation,

we do not know whether we will be involved in additional claims in the future as we seek to hire and retain qualified personnel or that such claims will not result in material litigation. We could incur substantial costs in litigating any such claims, regardless of the merits.

Our Products Must Comply With Evolving Industry Standards and Complex Government Regulations or Else Our Products May Not Be Widely Accepted, Which May Prevent Us From Growing Our Net Revenue or Achieving Profitability

The market for network equipment products is characterized by the need to support industry standards as different standards emerge, evolve and achieve acceptance. We will not be competitive unless we continually introduce new products and product enhancements that meet these emerging standards. In the past, we have introduced new products that were not compatible with certain technological standards, and in the future we may not be able to effectively address the compatibility and interoperability issues that arise as a result of technological changes and evolving industry standards. Our products must comply with various United States federal government regulations and standards defined by agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission, in addition to standards established by governmental authorities in various foreign countries and recommendations of the International Telecommunication Union. If we do not comply with existing or evolving industry standards or if we fail to obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory approvals or certificates we will not be able to sell our products where these standards or regulations apply, which may prevent us from sustaining our net revenue or achieving profitability.

Failure to Successfully Expand Our Sales and Support Teams or Educate Them In Regard to Technologies and Our Product Families May Harm Our Operating Results

The sale of our products and services requires a concerted effort that is frequently targeted at several levels within a prospective customer’s organization. We may not be able to increase net revenue unless we expand our sales and support teams in order to address all of the customer requirements necessary to sell our products.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate employees into our company or to educate current and future employees in regard to rapidly evolving technologies and our product families. A failure to do so may hurt our revenue growth and operating results.

We May Engage in Future Acquisitions that Dilute the Ownership Interests of Our Stockholders, Cause Us to Incur Debt and Assume Contingent Liabilities

As part of our business strategy, we review acquisition and strategic investment prospects that we believe would complement our current product offerings, augment our market coverage or enhance our technical capabilities, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. From time to time we review investments in new businesses and we expect to make investments in, and to acquire, businesses, products, or technologies in the future. In the event of any future acquisitions, we could:

•

issue equity securities which would dilute current stockholders’ percentage ownership;

•

incur substantial debt;

•

assume contingent liabilities; or

•

expend significant cash.

These actions by us could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or the price of our common stock. Moreover, even if we do obtain benefits in the form of increased sales and earnings, there may be a lag between the time when the expenses associated with an acquisition are incurred and the time when we recognize such benefits. This is particularly relevant in cases where it is necessary to integrate new types of technology into our existing portfolio and new types of products may be targeted for potential customers with which we do not have pre-existing relationships.

Acquisitions and investment activities also entail numerous risks, including:

•

difficulties in the assimilation of acquired operations, technologies and/or products;

•

unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition or investment transaction;

•

the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

•

adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;

•

risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience;

•

the potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations;

•

substantial charges for the amortization of certain purchased intangible assets, deferred stock compensation or similar items; and

•

impairment charges taken in the future for goodwill amounts that cannot be supported in future periods.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies, or personnel that we might acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We May Need Additional Capital to Fund Our Future Operations and, If It Is Not Available When Needed, We May Need to Reduce Our Planned Development and Marketing Efforts, Which May Reduce Our Net Revenue and Prevent Us From Achieving Profitability

We believe that our existing working capital, based on proceeds from our initial public offering in April 1999, proceeds from our secondary offering in October 1999, proceeds from our convertible subordinated debt offering in December 2001 and cash available from credit facilities and future operations, will enable us to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, if cash from future operations is insufficient, or if cash is used for acquisitions or other currently unanticipated uses, we may need additional capital. The development and marketing of new products and the expansion of reseller and distribution channels and associated support personnel requires a significant commitment of resources. In addition, if the markets for our products develop more slowly than anticipated, or if we fail to establish significant market share and achieve sufficient net revenue, we may continue to consume significant amounts of capital. As a result, we could be required to raise additional capital. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution of the shares held by existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, such securities may provide the holders certain rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of common stockholders, and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our operations. We cannot assure you that additional capital, if required, will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

We Significantly Increased Our Leverage as a Result of the Sale of Convertible Subordinated Notes

In connection with the sale of convertible subordinated notes in December 2001, we incurred $200 million of indebtedness. We will require substantial amounts of cash to fund scheduled payments of interest on the convertible notes, payment of the principal amount of the convertible notes, future capital expenditures, payments on our leases and any increased working capital requirements. If we are unable to meet our cash requirements out of cash flow from operations, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain alternative financing. The degree to which we are financially leveraged could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. In the absence of such financing, our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions, to make future acquisitions, to absorb adverse operating results or to fund capital expenditures or increased working capital requirements would be significantly reduced. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, some of which are beyond our control. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to repay the notes at maturity, we could attempt to refinance the notes; however, no assurance can be given that such a refinancing would be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure by us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes at maturity (with respect to payments of principal) or prior thereto (with respect to payments of interest or required repurchases) would constitute a default under the indenture and could cause a default under agreements governing our other indebtedness.

We Have Entered into Long-Term Lease Agreements for Several Facilities that are Currently Vacant and May be Difficult to Sublease due to Current Real Estate Market Conditions

We have certain long-term real estate lease commitments carrying future obligations for non-cancelable lease payments net of estimated sublease income. Reductions in our workforce and the restructuring of operations during fiscal year 2002 resulted in the need to consolidate certain of these leased facilities, located primarily in Northern California. We recorded excess facilities charges of $9.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and $25.4 million during fiscal 2002. For more information, see Note 8 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” above. We intend to sublease certain of these facilities and may obtain sublease income to offset the carrying costs of these facilities. However, based on a recent deterioration of real estate market conditions in connection with a downturn in the economy, we will not be able to sublease these facilities at the times or on the terms we anticipated when we took the excess facilities charge and therefore if the market

does not improve, we may incur additional charges in the future. In addition, we may incur additional charges for excess facilities as a result of additional reductions in our workforce or future restructuring of operations. We will continue to be responsible for all carrying costs of these facilities until such time as we can sublease these facilities or terminate the applicable leases based on the contractual terms of the lease agreements, and these costs may have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our Stock Price Has Been Volatile In the Past and Our Stock Price and the Price of the Notes May Significantly Fluctuate in the Future

In the past, our common stock price has fluctuated significantly. This could continue as we or our competitors announce new products, our customers’ results fluctuate, conditions in the networking or semiconductor industry change, or when investors change their sentiment toward stocks in the networking technology sector.

In addition, fluctuations in our stock price and our price-to-earnings multiple may make our stock attractive to momentum, hedge or day-trading investors who often shift funds into and out of stock rapidly, exacerbating price fluctuations in either direction, particularly when viewed on a quarterly basis.

Securities We Issue to Fund Our Operations Could Dilute Your Ownership

We may decide to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing to fund our operations. If we raise funds by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of current stockholders will be reduced and the new equity securities may have rights prior to those of our common stock, including the common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. We may not obtain sufficient financing on terms that are favorable to you or us. We may delay, limit or eliminate some or all of our proposed operations if adequate funds are not available.

Provisions in Our Charter Documents and Delaware Law and Our Adoption of a Stockholder Rights Plan May Delay or Prevent Acquisition Of Us, Which Could Decrease the Value of Our Common Stock and, Therefore, the Notes

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. In addition, our board of directors has the right to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer. Although we believe these provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law and our stockholder rights plan, which is described below, will provide for an opportunity to receive a higher bid by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some of our stockholders.

Our board of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan, pursuant to which we declared and paid a dividend of one right for each share of common stock held by stockholders of record as of May 14, 2001. Under the plan, each right will entitle stockholders to purchase a fractional share of our preferred stock for $150.00. Each such fractional share of the new preferred stock has terms designed to make it substantially the economic equivalent of one share of common stock. Initially the rights will not be exercisable and will trade with our common stock. Generally, the rights may become exercisable if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our common stock or commences a tender or exchange offer upon consummation of which such person or group would beneficially own 15% or more of our common stock. When the rights become exercisable, our board of directors has the right to authorize the issuance of one share of our common stock in exchange for each right that is then exercisable.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity

We are exposed to interest rate risk, primarily on our investment portfolio and long-term debt obligations. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximize the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, other non-government

debt securities and money market funds. In general, money market funds are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate.

Long-term debt consists of $200.0 million of 3.5% convertible subordinated notes. The nominal interest rate on these notes is fixed and the notes provide for semi-annual interest payments of $3.5 million each June 1 and December 1. The notes are convertible into our common stock at any time prior to the close of business on the maturity date, unless previously redeemed or repurchased, subject to adjustment in certain events.

The following table presents the amounts of our cash equivalents, short-term investments, marketable securities and long-term debt that are subject to market risk by range of expected maturity and weighted-average interest rates as of December 31, 2002 (dollars in thousands). This table does not include money market funds because those funds are not subject to market risk.

	Maturing in
	Three months or less			Three months to one year			Greater than one year			Total		Fair Value
Included in cash and cash equivalents	$	2,850								$	2,850	$	2,850
Weighted average interest rate		1.77	%
Included in short-term investments	$	119,904		$	39,539					$	159,443	$	159,443
Weighted average interest rate		1.92	%		3.92	%
Included in marketable securities							$	210,990		$	210,990	$	210,990
Weighted average interest rate								3.61	%
Long-term debt							$	200,000		$	200,000	$	152,032
Average fixed rate								3.50	%

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

Currently, all of our sales and the majority of our expenses are denominated in United States dollars and as a result, we have experienced no significant foreign exchange gains and losses to date. While we have conducted some transactions in foreign currencies during the three and six months ended December 31, 2002 and expect to continue to do so, we do not anticipate that foreign exchange gains or losses will be significant, in part because of our foreign exchange risk management process discussed below.

Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts

We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the effect of gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”). At December 31, 2002, these exposures amounted to $2.0 million and were partially offset by foreign currency forward contracts with a notional principal amount of $2.0 million (fair value of approximately $108,000). These contracts were traded in the last fiscal month of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 45 days.

We also use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain operating expenses, denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. At December 31, 2002, these exposures amounted to $6.7 million and were partially offset by forward foreign currency contracts with a notional principal amount of $6.7 million (fair value of approximately $85,000). These contracts were traded in the last week of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 60 days.

Investments in Equity Securities

We have historically made investments in several privately held companies. These nonmarketable investments are accounted for under the cost method, as ownership is less than 20 percent and we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating, financing and investing activities of the investee companies. These investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products they have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. It is possible that we could lose our entire initial investment in these companies. As a part of management’s

process of regularly reviewing these investments for impairment, we recorded write-downs of $9.7 million in fiscal 2002 on certain investments, which were determined to be other than temporarily impaired. At December 31, 2002, the carrying value of our remaining investments was immaterial.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended within the 90 day period prior to the filing date of this report. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date.

There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referenced in paragraph (a) above.

PART II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Other than the securities fraud class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York beginning on July 6, 2001, as described in Note 5 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” we are not aware of any pending legal proceedings against us that, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. We may in the future be party to litigation arising in the course of our business, including claims that we allegedly infringe third-party patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

Item 2. Changes in Securities — None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities — None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Extreme Networks held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 4, 2002 to elect two class I directors and to ratify the appointment of independent auditors of Extreme Networks.

At the Annual Meeting the preceding proposals were voted on with the following results:

	For	Votes Against	Withheld	Abstain
Elect Gordon L. Stitt	85,187,951	—	13,033,008	—
Elect Kenneth Levy	97,689,390	—	531,569	—
Ratify the appointment of independent auditors	92,457,166	5,147,075	—	616,717

Item 5. Other Information — None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

Exhibits:

99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

99.2

Certification of Principal Accounting Officer

Reports on Form 8-K — None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.

(Registrant)

/s/ HAROLD L. COVERT

HAROLD L. COVERT

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

and Secretary

February 11, 2003

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gordon L. Stitt, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extreme Networks, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: February 11, 2003

/s/ GORDON L. STITT

Gordon L. Stitt

Chief Executive Officer

I, Harold L. Covert, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extreme Networks, Inc.;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

Dated: February 11, 2003

/s/ HAROLD L. COVERT

Harold L. Covert

Chief Financial Officer

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gordon L. Stitt, Chief Executive Officer of Extreme Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: February 11, 2003

/s/ GORDON L. STITT

Gordon L. Stitt

Chief Executive Officer

Certification of Principal Accounting Officer

EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I, Harold L. Covert, the principal accounting officer of Extreme Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: February 11, 2003

/s/ HAROLD L. COVERT

Harold L. Covert

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents